The 8-year-old girl who took Viagra to stay alive was questioned about her poor parenting: why do people “think the wrong way”?

According to a media report, an 8-year-old girl in Xuchang, Henan province, went to a pharmacy to buy Viagra (sildenafil), which aroused the curiosity of the crowd at the scene. In the face of the pharmacist’s question of “lax parenting”, the girl’s mother could only tearfully explain the truth. It is reported that in China, more than 5 million patients (pulmonary arterial hypertension) rely on “Viagra” (sildenafil) every day to stay alive. The cost of medication is between 20,000 and 200,000 RMB.

For something like this, if you are not a patient or a family member, you may never understand the seriousness of “life extension”. For most people, they may have some knowledge about Viagra (sildenafil), but not about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH). (c) Unfamiliarity. As such, the pharmacist’s question may also fall within a specific category of “orderly misunderstanding.

But it is not just a purely “orderly misunderstanding” in the sense of a general misunderstanding, which includes the moral act of “thinking out of the box”. misinterpretation. After all, the most immediate function of Viagra (sildenafil) is to “aid in sex”, and Viagra’s (sildenafil) The name transliteration reference is also based on Chinese implication.

In short, these objective features can easily produce “orderly misunderstanding”. However, for more people, when confronted with an “8-year-old girl” buying Viagra (sildenafil), there will always be Think about it. So, after the media report, the matter quickly triggered widespread debate. After all, “life-extending knowledge” is not in the “Viagra” (sildenafil) in the mainstream function.

In many cases, misunderstandings are common because of a lack of understanding. The most important thing to remember is that it’s not just a matter of time, it’s also a matter of time. The “sexual needs” of adults are, frankly, normal needs, as necessary as eating and sleeping. Frankly speaking, the “sexual needs” of adults should be normal needs, as necessary as eating and sleeping. However, in general, talking about sex openly is still very secretive.

Especially for women, whether they actively “need sex” or “talk about sex openly”, the moral environment in China has been very harsh. The story of the “8-year-old girl buying Viagra” will naturally poke a moral nerve. So, it’s only natural that the “8-year-old girl bought Viagra” thing would sting the moral nerve. Therefore, it is not surprising that the crowd was curious. However, the roots and culture behind it are worthy of our deep thoughts and questions.

From “thinking crooked” to why “thinking crooked”, we should actually face up to why “thinking crooked” is triggered when it comes to “sexuality”. Logic. In fact, things like “8-year-old girl buys Viagra” in the context of “men buy sanitary napkins” and “women buy sex toys”. It is also more prominent. However, these things are often avoided for reasons of secrecy.

First of all, in the case of the condom, the general perception is that the first thing to be emphasized is “sex” rather than “safety per se”. That is why, over the years, free condoms have been distributed to appeal to the health of both sexes, but often not in a satisfactory manner. This is because the vast majority of people are reluctant to accept condoms in public. This is because, subconsciously, they feel that by accepting them, they are “impure”.

This perception is especially prevalent in the female population. In this regard, we will find that there is also a certain “word substitution” in Chinese expressions. The pronoun “sexual organ” is generally not used directly, in favour of more generic names. In the case of “Viagra” (sildenafil), for example, it seems to be a term unique to China.

Of course, exaggerating the dangers of sex should be taken seriously. Also, sex education should not be conducted with a blindfold. In a civilized society, if a healthy person doesn’t even dare to talk about basic physical characteristics, then, in such an environment. People only have a distorted idea of “sexual exploration”. In addition, in the current sexual awareness atmosphere in China, very few people dare to talk about “enjoying sex”.

It is a sad fact that sex education for young people in China is more thanks to the “love action” movies of “island countries”. In essence, it is not the youth’s fault, but the human instinct to explore sexuality. Any individual, when his or her sexuality becomes mature, will unconsciously explore and satisfy himself or herself. So, it is understandable that “the modest man in the physiology class, but the daring man in the dormitory”.

As a matter of fact, human beings have different sexual values at different times. However, they can basically be divided into two types, the negative values and the positive values. Anti-sexual values, in fact, originate from asceticism, which is more common in the country. Positive sexual values, in particular, are opposed to the sole purpose of reproduction, but also to asceticism. It itself craves sexual pleasure. Of course, this should be more and more obvious in modern society.

It is just that the real “liberation of sexuality” must be the practice of gender affirmation. Unfortunately, to a certain extent, intimate behavior between the sexes in China is still regarded as “male dominance”. In particular, men are still dominant in the demand for cohabitation. In addition, in intimate behavior, women are proud of being passive and ashamed of being active.

In the end, this is a distorted manifestation caused by cultural entrapment. From an individual’s perspective, the intimate act of two people can essentially be pleasurable in the process. Thus, it can be empirically demonstrated that it is not from an objective subjective object. As for the subjective division of people into “attack” or “defense”, it actually belongs to a subjective perspective.

As such, the logical mechanism of “thinking out of shape” is essentially a distortion of thought. As for the act itself, there is no moral flaw. As, “sildenafil”, is a drug, can treat “pulmonary arterial hypertension”, can also be appropriate “help sex”. Just as a bucket of water can be used for bathing and cooking, we cannot assume that bathing is immoral. In the end, it’s a matter of perception, and the low perception caused by the cultural entrenchment of the environment in which we live.

Original article, thank you for reproduction, first WeChat public number: qingnianxuejia.

Spread the love
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •